PUMA
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione     
Bartolini R., Pardelli G., Goggi S., Giannini S., Biagioni S. A terminological "journey" in the Grey Literature domain. In: GL18 - Eighteenth International Conference on Grey Literature: Leveraging Diversity in Grey Literature. (New York, USA, 28-29 November 2016). Abstract, pp. 79 - 84. Dominic Farace, Jerry Frantzen (eds.). (GL-Conference series. ISSN: 1385-2308, vol. 18). TextRelease, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
 
 
Abstract
(English)
“When we read the articles or papers of a particular domain, we can recognize some lexical items in the texts as technical terms. In a domain where new knowledge is generated, new terms are constantly created to fulfil the needs of the domain, while others become obsolete. In addition, existing terms may undergo changes of meaning…” (Kageura K.,1998/1999). According to Kaugera, our aim with this work is to make a “journey” in the Grey Literature (GL) domain in order to offer an overall vision on the terms used and the links" "between them. Moreover, by performing a terminological comparison over a given period of time it could be possible to trace the presence of obsolete words as well as of neologisms in the most recent research fields.Within this scenario, the work analyzes a corpus constituted of the entire amount of full" "research papers published in the GL conference series over a time span of more than one decade (2003-2014) with the aim of creating a terminological map of relevant words. “… corpora used to extract terminological units can be further investigated to find semantic and conceptual information on terms or to represent conceptual relationships between terms. (Bourigault D. et al., 2001). Another interesting inquiry is the terminology used in the GL conferences for describing the types of documents (Pejšová P. et al., 2012). The work is split up in four sections: creation of the corpus by acquiring the digital papers of GL conference proceedings (GL5 – GL16)1; data cleaning; data processing; terminological" "analysis and comparison. The corpus - made up of 231 research papers (for a total amount of 785.042 tokens) - was processed using a Natural Language Processing (NLP) tool for term extraction developed at the Institute of Computational Linguistics “Antonio Zampolli” of CNR (Goggi et al. 2015; 2016). This tool is what is called a “pipeline” (that is, a sequence of different tools) which extracts lexical knowledge from texts: in short, this is a rule system tool for knowledge extraction and document indexing that combines NLP technologies for term extraction and techniques to measure the associative strength of multi-words. This tool extracts a list of single (monograms) and multi-word terms (bigrams and trigrams) ordered by frequency with respect to the context. The pipeline - used as semantic engine within the MAPS project - has been customized for the extraction of terms from our corpus. This survey on the results of the information extraction process performed by the described NLP tool has been a sort of linguistic path in the past and present of terminology used in GL proceedings. By means of samplings, it has been possible to obtain the terminological flow in GL domain and to determine if and how the lexicon was evolving over these twelve years and investigate on its dynamic nature.
Subject Grey Literature, Digital Repositories, Open Access
A.1 INTRODUCTORY AND SURVEY


Icona documento 1) Download Document PDF


Icona documento Open access Icona documento Restricted Icona documento Private

 


Per ulteriori informazioni, contattare: Librarian http://puma.isti.cnr.it

Valid HTML 4.0 Transitional